News
 

Bookmark and Share

(3) 

Be quiet!, a leading supplier of power supply units from Europe, said this week that all of its power supply units (PSUs) available on the market today, are compatible with Intel Corp.’s next-generation Core i-series “Haswell” microprocessors. The company also revealed some information about its previous-generation products that are currently in use by its customers.

It recently transpired that Intel Haswell's C6/C7 power states require a minimum load of 0.05A on the 12V2 rail, whereas many desktop PSUs just cannot provide that low current. Numerous older PSUs, which comply with ATX12V v2.3 design guidelines that only called for a minimum load of 0.5A on the CPU power rail, can be equipped with a less sophisticated internal feedback loop/protection that cannot supply 0.05A to CPU. As a result, unless C6/C7 power states are disabled in the BIOS, PCs with older/cheap PSUs may become unstable when processors enter these states. To make the matters worse, many power supply units do not report minimum currents supported by 12V2 rail. As a result, it is now hard for system makers and end-users to determine whether their PSUs are Intel Core i-series “Haswell” compatible.

 

All current power supply models from Be quiet!, starting with the entry-level Pure Power L8 up to the high-end Dark Power Pro 10, are able to deliver the above mentioned low loads without problems. Even older models are mostly compatible with the fourth-generation Intel Core i microprocessors. Dark Power Pro 10 (all models), Straight Power E9 (all models), Pure Power L8 (all models), System Power 7 (all models) and Pure Power L7 (630W and 730W) are fully Haswell compatible.

Tags: Be Quiet!, Intel, Haswell, Core, 22nm, Shark Bay, Lynx Point

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 05/23/13 03:05:41 PM
Latest comment: 05/25/13 04:42:12 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-1]

1. 
They don't manufacture their PSUs so they are just reporting what they have been told. Virtually any PSU that uses a DC-to-DC configuration for the 3V and 5V power sources will meet Intel's dumbarse requirements for C6/C7 ops. Leave it to Intel to dream up bandaid moves to try and compete with AMDs constantly improving ULV designs and ops.
1 2 [Posted by: beenthere  | Date: 05/23/13 03:05:41 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
AMD's performance per watt is crap compared to Intel and has been for a solid 3 years now.
2 0 [Posted by: AnonymousGuy  | Date: 05/23/13 06:57:12 PM]
Reply
 
Except when software is coded for heterogenous computing. Make no mistake, Intel are shit scared because they don't have a true APU.
1 2 [Posted by: linuxlowdown  | Date: 05/25/13 04:42:12 AM]
Reply

[1-1]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Thursday, August 28, 2014

12:22 pm | AMD Has No Plans to Reconsider Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Cards. AMD Will Not Lower Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Solutions

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

9:09 pm | Samsung Begins to Produce 2.13GHz 64GB DDR4 Memory Modules. Samsung Uses TSV DRAMs for 64GB DDR4 RDIMMs

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

6:41 pm | AMD Quietly Reveals Third Iteration of GCN Architecture with Tonga GPU. AMD Unleashes Radeon R9 285 Graphics Cards, Tonga GPU, GCN 1.2 Architecture

Monday, August 25, 2014

6:05 pm | Chinese Inspur to Sell Mission-Critical Servers with AMD Software, Power 8 Processors. IBM to Enter Chinese Big Data Market with the Help from Inspur

Sunday, August 24, 2014

6:12 pm | Former X-Bit Labs Editor Aims to Wed Tabletop Games with Mobile Platforms. Game Master Wants to Become a New World of Warcraft