News
 

Bookmark and Share

(3) 

Be quiet!, a leading supplier of power supply units from Europe, said this week that all of its power supply units (PSUs) available on the market today, are compatible with Intel Corp.’s next-generation Core i-series “Haswell” microprocessors. The company also revealed some information about its previous-generation products that are currently in use by its customers.

It recently transpired that Intel Haswell's C6/C7 power states require a minimum load of 0.05A on the 12V2 rail, whereas many desktop PSUs just cannot provide that low current. Numerous older PSUs, which comply with ATX12V v2.3 design guidelines that only called for a minimum load of 0.5A on the CPU power rail, can be equipped with a less sophisticated internal feedback loop/protection that cannot supply 0.05A to CPU. As a result, unless C6/C7 power states are disabled in the BIOS, PCs with older/cheap PSUs may become unstable when processors enter these states. To make the matters worse, many power supply units do not report minimum currents supported by 12V2 rail. As a result, it is now hard for system makers and end-users to determine whether their PSUs are Intel Core i-series “Haswell” compatible.

 

All current power supply models from Be quiet!, starting with the entry-level Pure Power L8 up to the high-end Dark Power Pro 10, are able to deliver the above mentioned low loads without problems. Even older models are mostly compatible with the fourth-generation Intel Core i microprocessors. Dark Power Pro 10 (all models), Straight Power E9 (all models), Pure Power L8 (all models), System Power 7 (all models) and Pure Power L7 (630W and 730W) are fully Haswell compatible.

Tags: Be Quiet!, Intel, Haswell, Core, 22nm, Shark Bay, Lynx Point

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 05/23/13 03:05:41 PM
Latest comment: 05/25/13 04:42:12 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-1]

1. 
They don't manufacture their PSUs so they are just reporting what they have been told. Virtually any PSU that uses a DC-to-DC configuration for the 3V and 5V power sources will meet Intel's dumbarse requirements for C6/C7 ops. Leave it to Intel to dream up bandaid moves to try and compete with AMDs constantly improving ULV designs and ops.
1 2 [Posted by: beenthere  | Date: 05/23/13 03:05:41 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
AMD's performance per watt is crap compared to Intel and has been for a solid 3 years now.
2 0 [Posted by: AnonymousGuy  | Date: 05/23/13 06:57:12 PM]
Reply
 
Except when software is coded for heterogenous computing. Make no mistake, Intel are shit scared because they don't have a true APU.
1 2 [Posted by: linuxlowdown  | Date: 05/25/13 04:42:12 AM]
Reply

[1-1]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Monday, July 21, 2014

12:56 pm | Microsoft to Fire 18,000 Employees to Boost Efficiency. Microsoft to Perform Massive Job Cut Ever Following Acquisition of Nokia

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

6:11 am | Apple Teams Up with IBM to Make iPhone and iPad Ultimate Tools for Businesses and Enterprises. IBM to Sell Business-Optimized iPhone and iPad Devices

Monday, July 14, 2014

6:01 am | IBM to Invest $3 Billion In Research of Next-Gen Chips, Process Technologies. IBM to Fund Development of 7nm and Below Process Technologies, Help to Create Post-Silicon Future

5:58 am | Intel Postpones Launch of High-End “Broadwell-K” Processors to July – September, 2015. High-End Core i “Broadwell” Processors Scheduled to Arrive in Q3 2015

5:50 am | Intel Delays Introduction of Core M “Broadwell” Processors Further. Low-Power Broadwell Chips Due in Late 2014