| Benchmark | Mobile AMD Duron 700MHz | Mobile Pentium III 700MHz | Mobile Celeron 700MHz |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPU WinMark99 | 3830 | 3700 | 3700 |
| CPUmark99 | 59.3 | 63.6 | 54.4 |
| Ligos Technology GoMotion smaller value - faster performance | 41.25 | 50.25 | 52.40 |
As for the third benchmark, Ligos Technology GoMotion, it’s a totally different story since it’s MPEG-encoding, which is not that common for use on notebooks. However, the first two tests are quite interesting. To tell the truth, it looks as if AMD was greatly mistaken to have called this CPU a Duron. If they had called it something like "mobile Athlon", for instance, it could have been moved to a different category right away. Then, it wouldn’t have to comply with the requirements for Low-End processors. On the other hand, high power consumption remains on the agenda. In fact, the current mobile Duron isn’t yet well prepared and adjusted for fitting the mobile market. However, we do believe that heat dissipation issue can be eliminated, while the potential (FSB, memory, etc.) remains for ever. :)
We find it useful to add that the situation with Duron’s high heat dissipation can be improved in May-June when the new mobile Duron processors based on Morgan core come out. First, they are very likely to be working at lower Vcore (which will automatically result in lower power consumption), and second, they will also support PowerNow! (which will allow reducing the CPU working frequency in case it is battery powered). Although Duron processors are still too far away from the "1W CPUs", which are expected to be announced by Intel this month already...





