News

Even though the so-called hybrid hard disk drives (HHDs) have received quite a lot of hype, they could not deliver tangible performance improvements that consumers expected. As a consequence the demand towards is currently fairly low and some makers even do not think they need to add such products into lineup.

Hybrid hard disk drives feature additional flash cache of different capacity that can store certain continuously used data. Manufacturers promised that the hybrid hard drives would cut down power consumption, increase battery life, and, most importantly, speed-up boot-up time. However, the actual performance increases of HHDs is not crucial and customers are reluctant to pay extra for them, executives of hard disk drive makers reveald at Diskcon 2007 conference, reports Cnet News.com web-site.

“The initial versions haven’t delivered the performance consumers expected,” said Dr. Richard New, director of research for Hitachi Global Storage Technologies.

The problem might be correctable if drive makers put in more flash. Right now, hybrid drives have 256MB of memory, but if 4GB or so are installed, the flash could hold a lot more storage, which in turn would reduce power consumption and help boot-up time. However, that would raise prices, which may distract customers from the HHDs.

According to Fujitsu Computing Products of America claims that hybrid hard drives with small cache ensure boot-up time drop from 28 seconds with a standard drive to 21 seconds with a hybrid. However, the company believes that consumers are not going to pay for such a small advantage.

Discussion

Comments currently: 5
Discussion started: 09/21/07 05:17:43 PM
Latest comment: 06/17/08 09:46:21 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-4]

1. 
I'd much rather have the caching happen in a standalone Flash which could be upgraded or replaced if needed.

[Posted by: shae  | Date: 09/21/07 05:17:43 PM]

2. 
Flash memory is costly because it has limited writes and its throughput is low (about a few hundred kilobytes per second). Also HHD are specifically designed to work with Windows Vista, so OS like Linux will not take advantage of it. HHD are a waste even if 4 GB of Flash memory is included. It is best to buy SSD instead buying HDD because they are designed around Flash memory and they have circuity to increase Flash memory throughput. I only know one company that sells very high quality SSD that minimizes all Flash memory problems. The company named Bitmicro has such features and are good enough for servers and aerospace. Sure there is Transcend and some others, but they sell flash memory storage on steroids with out any technology or features to minimize problems.
[Posted by: linuxnerd  | Date: 09/21/07 07:39:47 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

3. 
Jeez...how lame, you completely plagiarized the same article on cnet!
[Posted by: tbone  | Date: 09/30/07 10:39:47 PM]

4. 
I might have to get one of those hard drives. http://crenk.com
[Posted by: Steven Finch  | Date: 06/17/08 09:46:21 AM]

[1-4]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 21, 2009

7:53 am | Cell Network Operators Set to Become Largest Mobile Internet Devices Sellers – Analysts. Mobile Network Operators to Gain Strength in Devices

Friday, November 20, 2009

10:11 pm | ATI Seeks Its Best to Ensure More Radeon HD 5-Series Supplies – Company. Additional Number of DirectX 11 Graphics Boards is Incoming

11:56 am | Fusion-io’s SSD Setup Reaches 1TB/s Aggregate Bandwidth. Fusion-io Gets Contracts from Government, Creates World’s Fastest SSD Setup

10:06 am | Notebook – the Most Desired Christmas Gift, Says CEA. Notebooks, Players and HDTVs Top Christmas Presents Wish List

9:11 am | Ebay Completes Skype Sell Off. Skype No Longer Belongs to Ebay