Bookmark and Share


Kingston Digital, a division of Kingston Technology, has begun shipping its new-generation Kingston SSDNow V300-series, a cost-efficient family of solid-state drives. The new SSDs provide high levels of performance and are based on the latest breed of controllers and multi-level cell NAND flash memory; yet, they are very competitively priced.

Kingston SSDNow V300 family of solid-state drives include 60GB, 120GB and 240GB models powered by LSI SandForce SF-2281 controller as well as multi-level cell NAND flash memory produced using 19nm fabrication process. The new drives provide out-of-the-box sequential read and write speeds of up to 450MB/s as well as maximum random read input/output operations per second (IOPS) of 85000.

"LSI worked together with Kingston to deliver a customized high-performing solid-state drive solution for their cost-effective SSDNow V series. Our award-winning SF-2281 Client FSPs provide Kingston's customers with enterprise-class features and an enhanced everyday computing user experience, especially for first time SSD users," said Kent Smith, senior director of product marketing at flash components division at LSI.

The Kingston SSDNow V300 is available as a stand-alone drive or as an upgrade kit containing cloning software and other accessories for a desktop and/or notebook system. SSDNow V300 is backed by a three-year warranty and free technical support.

"Kingston is committed to delivering SSDs at the best price to performance ratio as possible. We achieve this again with our next-generation SSDNow V300. The SSDNow V300 is the best cost-efficient upgrade for users who want their existing systems to perform faster. They will experience faster boot up and shutdown times, and will also see much better system performance when multiple applications are open," said Ariel Perez, SSD business manager at Kingston.

Tags: Kingston, SSDNow, LSI, SandForce, 19nm, SSD, NAND, Flash


Comments currently: 6
Discussion started: 11/15/12 01:54:57 AM
Latest comment: 11/24/12 02:31:46 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads


"The new drives provide out-of-the-box sequential read and write speeds of up to 450MB/s as well as maximum random read input/output operations per second (IOPS) of 85000."

so whats the big deal here,so what we can finally buy a few MB/s more throughput over a slow PCi-E bus interconnect this year, we already know that antiquated limited write NAND Flash SSDs are reaching their limits already and IMO should have never been used as NV ram or at least retired and transitioned already given the already exists today from several vendors Samsung etc and was known about years before.

the real question in 2012/13 should be so when will we get the real deal extreme power efficiency of "Wide I/O" Mobile unlimited read/write MRAM/FRAM/other real Dram type speeds and super low latency's of NV ram in Wide I/O form to beat even that current up to 17GB/s per single channel spec and beyond never mind the even faster proposed "Wide I/O 2" for general purpose mass markets at a reasonable consumer price ?

hell even ARM inc have a real "AMBA4" Open Specifications 1 Terabit/s bus and matching CoreLink DMC-520 Dynamic Memory Controller block's already being tested in the worlds foundries ,
did the desktop dinosaurs BOD's sleep through all this while milking the PCi-E bus specs for all its worth as their general purpose slow bus interconnect

LOL at the down vote with no reply to counter the speeds and feeds i point out, so i take it you are happy with limited write slow speeds in 2012/13 Kingston want you to buy here then, if so i have a nice XT IDE mode 20gig hard drive for sale , that should suit you down to the ground, you are actually old enough to know what an "XT IDE mode HD" speed is i assume, the futures already here you just don't know it yet.
0 2 [Posted by: sanity  | Date: 11/15/12 01:54:57 AM]

If I'm reading this right, it would seem that these drives are only rated for about 500 P/E cycles. ...yeah, no thank you.
1 0 [Posted by: hsew  | Date: 11/15/12 05:26:27 AM]

All good points, Sanity!

Yes, the RACE IS ON for non-volatile RAM.

However, don't forget SATA and SAS cables: the Storage Developer Conference accepted our paper proposing overclocked data storage channels e.g. variable 8G, 12G and 16G "SATA-IV" transmission clocks and replacing the 8b/10b "legacy frame" with the 128b/130b "jumbo frame" now in the PCI-E 3.0 standard:

8G/8b = ~1.0 GB/second per SATA cable.

If you think WAAAAY back, the legacy PCI bus "synced" with ATA-133: 32 bits @ 33 MHz = 1,056 Mbps/8 = ~133 MB/second. Therefore, at a minimum, all future editions of the PCI-E bus should also "sync" with all future SATA and SAS data cables and integrated device controllers.
1 0 [Posted by: MRFS  | Date: 11/18/12 08:19:59 PM]
- collapse thread

im not sure what [our]paper your referring too there, got a link and a timeline handy ?

and what time scales do the "Storage Developer" ? Conference [Council] see for this to be in general availability ?

(im seriously not trying to be negative here, honest) while thats true and its a nice small bump to get ~1.0 GB/second per SATA cable presumably soon...

i thought it time to go and look up the latest RAM speeds and feeds specs for this rough (
PCI-E 3.0 to PCI-E 4.0 standard timeline on the assumption that your ~1.0 GB/second per SATA cable and the x2 ~2.0 GB/s at the 16G "SATA-IV" would generally not be available until close to the PCI-E 4.0 general availability) timeline.

as it happens there is now a reasonable write up posted November 15th, 2012 here

regarding next [LP]DDR4 and "wide I/O 2" that is rather jaw dropping, not in the fact the JEDEC membership screwed us yet again, but the fact although "wide I/O" is supposedly available 2013 as originally stated they label it niche-oriented parts now, just so they can insert an extended and slower LPDDR3E part and delay the real mass uptake by 2 years.

they are also artificially restricting "wide I/O 2" speed to the lower spec throughput 25.6-GB/s of LPDDR4-based mobile DRAMs rather than its real 34.4 GB/s at it's base followed by parts at 51.2-GB/s rather than the real dual channel 68.8GB/s.

as you can see, these speeds delayed for 2 or 3 years in the 2015 timeline make that ~1.0 or max ~2.0 GB/second per SATA cable seem lets say rather limited for taking advantage of MRAM type drives... especially by 2015 when you would expect at least 32nm MRAM and other NV ram then.

as i said im really trying to see the bright side here on getting far faster generic data throughput , wheres the cheap self contained home install kit PAN/LAN "fiber link" in a match box for the SOHO/Home desktop, that might just cover or at least improve these 2013-2015 expected speeds throughput to get a lot closer to the top speed perhaps...

as your not likely to get 20/10 raid0 SATA3/4 ports on an average SOHO/Home motherboard....
0 1 [Posted by: sanity  | Date: 11/24/12 01:53:28 PM]

p.s. It's also my opinion that storage vendors are trying to ride out the Recession in the USA -- by squeezing as much profit margin as possible out of Nand Flash storage. But, I also fear that they are setting themselves up for a price war, particularly if Intel gets uppity. At last count, there were about 100 Nand Flash vendors competing in that same niche, and almost all are hitting the same "6G Ceiling" with their SATA-III devices. Add to that the reality, well documented by this website, of serious performance degradation on systems that do not support TRIM, and on most RAID arrays even if one's OS does support TRIM. Want TRIM with RAID 0 arrays? Then, your choices are limited to the most recent Intel chipsets, but NOT (yet) supported by the leading add-on RAID controllers.
1 0 [Posted by: MRFS  | Date: 11/18/12 08:32:02 PM]
- collapse thread

yeah id also be of the same opinion on storage vendors but for the fact if you think about it the generic Ethernet vendors have done exactly the same thing for a lot longer, milking the high end, while providing nothing better than crappy 1GBit/s for years now to the SOHO/Home users, that needs to change ASAP.

its also clear that the Nand Flash vendors have put way to much time, effort and, cash into trying to make antiquated limited write NAND Flash SSDs and hybrid HD's work,and cant seem to stop themselves now..and call it a day, where a simple hybrid generic DRAM+generic HD would provide far better throughput since NAND Flash appeared never mind today.

its not like you even need a battery on any hybrid DRAM+generic HD setup as the PC spins up the drive before it can read/write to/from it anyway and writes the ram to the drive before powering down to save power if set that way... and thats been obvious for a long time, IMO , and now we have DDR3 NV MRAM to use everywhere... and since 2004 when Freescale first commercially made it for hybrid HD's , its been out there in real deep space sat's storage for a very long time now for instance.
0 0 [Posted by: sanity  | Date: 11/24/12 02:31:46 PM]


Add your Comment

Related news

Latest News

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

10:48 pm | LG’s Unique Ultra-Wide Curved 34” Display Finally Hits the Market. LG 34UC97 Available in the U.S. and the U.K.

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

12:52 pm | Lisa Su Appointed as New CEO of Advanced Micro Devices. Rory Read Steps Down, Lisa Su Becomes New CEO of AMD

Thursday, August 28, 2014

4:22 am | AMD Has No Plans to Reconsider Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Cards. AMD Will Not Lower Recommended Prices of Radeon R9 Graphics Solutions

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

1:09 pm | Samsung Begins to Produce 2.13GHz 64GB DDR4 Memory Modules. Samsung Uses TSV DRAMs for 64GB DDR4 RDIMMs

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

10:41 am | AMD Quietly Reveals Third Iteration of GCN Architecture with Tonga GPU. AMD Unleashes Radeon R9 285 Graphics Cards, Tonga GPU, GCN 1.2 Architecture