<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

News

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

We continue our journey to the future of graphics cards and 3D technologies with more information about the upcoming graphics processors from ATI Technologies and NVIDIA. Additional details about the code-named R420 product appeared and we are going to share them with you.

Sources with knowledge of the matter revealed that the graphics chip known under the code-name R420 and developed under project-name Loki will be two times faster than the original RADEON 9800 PRO. As we revealed earlier, it will incorporate 110 to 150 million of transistors (see this news-story) and will support Pixel and Vertex Shaders 3.0. I expect the part to feature 8 rendering pipelines with 2 texture modules per each or 16 pipelines with 1 texture module per pipe. Its architecture will have much in common with the original R300 and R350/R360.

Talking about manufacturing technology used for the R420, our sources said that the graphics processor will be made using mature TSMC’s 0.15 micron fabrication process which seems to be enough for modern VPUs.

Currently it is unknown when the Loki R420 to be heaven-sent to the Earth, but in general it is expected to arrive in late 2003 or early 2004. We even can see some samples of R420 graphics cards this Fall, but definitely not massive commercial availability of such products since ATI Technologies needs a timeframe to sell its R360 code-named product.

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Related news

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_2]%>
Comments currently: 6
Discussion started: 06/21/03 12:48:39 PM
Latest comment: 04/20/04 08:50:05 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-5]

1. 
Surely this must be a mistake. "Two times faster" means that the performance is 3:1, not 2:1. You don't mean that it is 200% faster, right?
[Posted by: Karl | Date: 06/21/03 12:48:39 PM]

2. 
ATI sucks cocks in hell
[Posted by: sagitti | Date: 08/15/03 04:56:45 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

3. 
is it VPU or GPU?
[Posted by: SomeOne | Date: 11/19/03 12:25:35 PM]

4. 
this car seems to be the top dog......but how much does it cost??
Im betting since the 9800pro is around 400, this card is going to be around $700, which for me isnt a problem, but im still not going to spend that much for a GPU. Graphics these days are way t much money and its getting rediculous.
[Posted by: bones | Date: 03/18/04 06:30:09 AM]

5. 
Bones: The card will probably cost $499, as the Geforce FX 6800 Ultra costs $499. They wouldn't make it more expensive than the 6800U.
[Posted by: tony | Date: 04/20/04 08:50:05 AM]

[1-5]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Latest News

Saturday, October 11, 2008

5:34 pm | Microsoft Denies Plans for Add-On Blu-Ray Drive for Xbox 360. Microsoft Denies Plans to Release External BD Drive for X360, But Does It Need To?

Friday, October 10, 2008

11:56 pm | Disney Expects Blu-Ray Sales to Surpass DVD in Two Years. Disney Predicts Blu-Ray Domination Shortly

11:40 am | Apple Warns End-Users of Faulty Nvidia Graphics Processing Units. Apple Claims Nvidia Misinformed Company of Lack of Problems with GPUs

Thursday, October 9, 2008

4:50 pm | Consumer Electronics Devices Set to Get Wi-Fi Support – Analysts. Shipments of Consumer Electronics Devices with Wi-Fi to Reach 1 Billion by 2012, Says In-Stat

3:04 pm | Asustek Reveals Eee PC Aimed at Demanding End-Users. Asus Eee PC S101 Debuts, Show Style and Higher Price

11:56 am | Micron Plans Layoffs Amid Rumoured Plans to Acquire Qimonda. Micron Technology to Restructure Memory Operations