The chances of the next-generation graphics products to reach store shelves this calendar year were not big at all and now they are equal to zero. Both leading companies have never commented on the rumours about NV40 or R420 graphics chips, even though unofficial stories built castles in the sky about the upcoming processors and their power.
A senior executive at ATI told me one day: “We do not need new graphics architecture this year”; a week after the conversation Mr. Jen-Hsun Huang, the CEO of NVIDIA, said during the quarter conference call that “Now ii is not a time to talk about next generation products…”
Based on such claims from the companies themselves and considering the rumours collected by this web-site, neither ATI nor NVIDIA are ready to roll-out powerful next-generation VPUs this year. There is absolutely no difference between the possible reasons of the postponement; we should take it as a fact and nothing more.
According to the information from the same web-site that watches all the rumours all the time from all around the web, the NV40 will have 8x2 architecture, include 175 million of transistors and will be equipped with 1500MHz memory. The target clocking of the chip is 600MHz. The part has not been taped out yet, according to the source, despite of the earlier claims.
ATI’s R420 VPU is expected to have 12x1 architecture, blazing core-speeds and skyrocketing memory. There is no information about its tape out, but I would doubt about its successful silicon implementation at this point.
The fourth generation graphics processors will support additional functionality of Pixel and Vertex Shaders 3.0 pushing the limits of 3D even further. But this will only happen next year, we should add...
Comments currently:
2
Discussion started: 09/12/03 08:04:54 AM
Latest comment: 01/28/04 07:52:25 AM
[1-2]
1.
I dunno, for nvidia at least it's porbably definately the time to be talking about new hardware, they are REALLY in the s**t now that they can't jsut claim all problems are due to 'synthetic benchmarks' they are suffering _horribly_ at the hands of ati in the half life 2 benchmarks released recently.
it's about time they released a part that not only still kicked ATI's ass in opengl (any disbeleivers go play with some proffesional 3d apps / benchmarks ) but did the same with directx 9 in raw hardware, instead of having to mess about with alternate codepaths and funky diver optimisations that there competitors dont need ... i really can't see the nv38 doing that , they should save their money, not press the chips, dont saturate the market with more w*nk overpriced poorly designed cards, and get on with the nv40 instead, cos i'll nevr buy an ATI part while they suck so bad at pro apps, but i'll never buy nv3x either.. and i WANT dx9 hw! :-/
[
Posted by: Yakumo

|
Date: 09/12/03 08:04:54 AM]
2.
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ati suxs
[
Posted by: eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

|
Date: 01/28/04 07:52:25 AM]
[1-2]