Bookmark and Share

Tags

32nm 40nm 45nm AMD Apple ASUS ATI ATIC Atom Business Cypress E-Book Evergreen Fermi Flash Geforce Globalfoundries GT300 Intel Microsoft Nforce Nokia Nvidia Radeon Semiconductor Sony SSD TSMC USB Windows

News

X-bit labs yesterday posted a news-story in regards of alleged application specific optimizations implemented into XGI Reactor drivers. Today the company denied the existence of application-specific optimisations.

“The .exe files listed in xrvkp.sys are only for developers’ analysis during beginning of the developing cycle. We left the file names in xrvkp.sys and have not removed since then. We will take more intensive care to avoid confusion in the future and will fix that in the next driver release,” commented Chris Lin of XGI.

Furthermore, there is remark from editors of Volari Gamers web-site.

“I have tried to rename the .exe files of benchmarks in order to see if there was any change of performance with such manipulation. Whereas NVIDIA drivers see their performance decrease with such a simple name change, I have seen no change in [XGI] performance when renaming the files,” said Xglider in his Volari V8 Ultra preview.

Observers have found names of executable files in xvrkp.sys files from the XGI Reactor driver-set. The purpose of having such files mentioned in the drivers was not clear, but since there were a number of industrial benchmarks among the titles declared, there was a suppose that XGI Reactor drivers activate special presets to improve performance or image quality in such applications. The suspicions, however, were denied by XGI.

X-bit labs will conduct an independent analysis of XGI Volari hardware and drivers in future.

Discussion

Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 12/19/03 12:08:28 AM
Latest comment: 12/22/03 03:58:38 AM

[1-2]

1. 
At http://www.hardware.fr they told that you can also found the .exe names in the binary part of the drivers. And if they are modified there, then they get some really different level of performance for xgi volari based card.
[Posted by: pma  | Date: 12/19/03 12:08:28 AM]

2. 
Yeah I second that there is definatley something wrong here, why should they have those names within the driver binary. Just another company which lies to their customers.
[Posted by: youshavemyballs  | Date: 12/22/03 03:58:38 AM]

[1-2]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

11:50 pm | Nvidia to Start Shipping Next-Generation Tegra to Developers “Soon”. Nvidia Readies Second-Generation Tegra SoC for Handhelds

10:37 pm | Despite Netbook Popularity, Consumers Still Want Notebooks – IDC. Even in Asia, Consumers Still Prefer Notebooks over Netbooks

4:04 pm | Imagination Intros Processors for “Internet Everywhere” Consumer Electronics. Imagination Presents Connected Processors for CE Devices

3:33 pm | Sub-$99 Blu-Ray Players Black Friday Deals Available, But Not a Lot. Walmart to Sell BD Players for $78 on Black Friday

12:27 pm | Microsoft Sued for Banning Third-Party Xbox Memory Cards. Memory Cards Supplier Sues Microsoft

11:55 am | OCZ to Release External USB 3.0 Solid-State Drive. OCZ USB 3.0 SSD Incoming for Consumer Electronics Show

7:52 am | Nvidia’s CEO Expects Underpowered Mobile Devices to Gain Popularity. PC of the Future – Web-Based Device with 4G Connectivity, Says Chief Exec of Nvidia