<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

News

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

X-bit labs yesterday posted a news-story in regards of alleged application specific optimizations implemented into XGI Reactor drivers. Today the company denied the existence of application-specific optimisations.

“The .exe files listed in xrvkp.sys are only for developers’ analysis during beginning of the developing cycle. We left the file names in xrvkp.sys and have not removed since then. We will take more intensive care to avoid confusion in the future and will fix that in the next driver release,” commented Chris Lin of XGI.

Furthermore, there is remark from editors of Volari Gamers web-site.

“I have tried to rename the .exe files of benchmarks in order to see if there was any change of performance with such manipulation. Whereas NVIDIA drivers see their performance decrease with such a simple name change, I have seen no change in [XGI] performance when renaming the files,” said Xglider in his Volari V8 Ultra preview.

Observers have found names of executable files in xvrkp.sys files from the XGI Reactor driver-set. The purpose of having such files mentioned in the drivers was not clear, but since there were a number of industrial benchmarks among the titles declared, there was a suppose that XGI Reactor drivers activate special presets to improve performance or image quality in such applications. The suspicions, however, were denied by XGI.

X-bit labs will conduct an independent analysis of XGI Volari hardware and drivers in future.

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Related news

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_2]%>
Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 12/19/03 12:08:28 AM
Latest comment: 12/22/03 03:58:38 AM

[1-2]

1. 
At http://www.hardware.fr they told that you can also found the .exe names in the binary part of the drivers. And if they are modified there, then they get some really different level of performance for xgi volari based card.
[Posted by: pma | Date: 12/19/03 12:08:28 AM]

2. 
Yeah I second that there is definatley something wrong here, why should they have those names within the driver binary. Just another company which lies to their customers.
[Posted by: youshavemyballs | Date: 12/22/03 03:58:38 AM]

[1-2]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Latest News

Friday, October 10, 2008

11:40 am | Apple Warns End-Users of Faulty Nvidia Graphics Processing Units. Apple Claims Nvidia Misinformed Company of Lack of Problems with GPUs

Thursday, October 9, 2008

4:50 pm | Consumer Electronics Devices Set to Get Wi-Fi Support – Analysts. Shipments of Consumer Electronics Devices with Wi-Fi to Reach 1 Billion by 2012, Says In-Stat

3:04 pm | Asustek Reveals Eee PC Aimed at Demanding End-Users. Asus Eee PC S101 Debuts, Show Style and Higher Price

11:56 am | Micron Plans Layoffs Amid Rumoured Plans to Acquire Qimonda. Micron Technology to Restructure Memory Operations

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

4:39 pm | Nvidia’s Partners Reluctant to Adopt New Flavour of a High-End Chip. Graphics Card Makers Hesitant to Produce GeForce GTX 260-216

11:15 am | Intel Sells Off Rackmount Server Operations to Kontron. Kontron Acquires Rackmount Server Business from Intel

7:34 am | Microsoft Preps External Blu-Ray Disc Optical Drive for Xbox 360. Microsoft Has Blu-Ray Drive for Xbox 360 Ready, Release Date Under Consideration

3:46 am | AMD Plans to Produce ATI Graphics Processor at The Foundry Company. The Foundry Company to Seek for Non-CPU Customers