<%BANNER[vz_728x90]%>
<%BANNER[vz_468x60]%>
<%BANNER[vz_300x250]%>

News

<%BANNER[vz_120x600]%>

NVIDIA Corp., one of the top graphics companies in the world, has reportedly canned further development of projects code-named NV48 and NV50. Currently the reasons for decisions are not clear and it is also unknown whether the company is on-track with its product family updates schedule.

Two reports at The Inquirer web-site claim that according to sources with knowledge of the matter, NVIDIA’s code-named NV48 and NV50 products will never see the light of the day. The web-site does not explain any exact reasons behind the move. Representatives for NVIDIA Corp. also declined to comment for the report.

A “Refresh” and A “New Architecture” Canned

NVIDIA’s NV48 chip was supposed to be a “refresh” for the company’s GeForce 6800 Ultra graphics processor that was expected to be feature a bit higher frequencies compared to the original parts. Now that the NV48 is canned, the GeForce 6800 Ultra will remain on top of NVIDIA’s product line for some time. Even though with abolition of the product NV48 NVIDIA is a bit behind ATI’s RADEON X850 XT Platinum Edition in terms of performance, the company is still in position to offer premium speed thanks to its Multi-GPU technology and a couple of its GeForce 6800 GT or GeForce 6800 Ultra graphics cards, but at higher price-point compared to single-card setup.

The product code-named NV50 is not something that was much discussed publicly. Typically NVIDIA names graphics processing units that features entirely new architecture with zero at the end of the code-name, e.g, NV10 (the first hardware T&L), NV20 (the first Shader Model 1.0 architecture), NV30 (the first Shader Model 2.0a chip), NV40 (the first Shader Model 3.0 chip). Some sources claimed that the NV50 was supposed to be launched in the second half of 2005.

Still, NVIDIA reportedly has a weapon to fight its arch-rival ATI Technologies: the company’s code-named NV47 that presumably contains 24 pixel pipelines is on-track to be released in the first half of the year 2005.

Reasons Unclear

The motives for NVIDIA to cancel the NV50 chip are currently unclear.

Typically graphics companies make radical modifications of the roadmaps in order to substitute certain products with different models that better correspond to market and financial needs. For instance, initial name for the RADEON X800 was R400, but then it evolved into R420, which was mainly a new visual processing unit with a bit different feature-set.

Another reason for products’ cancellation is the lack of certain feature-set to correspond to standards, such as DirectX, what was about to happen with 3dfx’s Rampage code-named chip that supported Shader Model 1.0, but did not support Pixel Shader 1.1, a requirement of DirectX 8.0.

Yet another reason for future product cancellation is shift towards higher performance products in the same timeframe as the original product was meant to be launched. For instance, some sources claim the original NV40 was supposed to have fewer pixel pipelines than the actual NV40, but then was canned in favour of the 16 pixel pipelines design.

Leading designers of graphics processors, such as ATI Technologies and NVIDIA Corp., are currently working on next generation visual processing units that will support feature-set of Windows Graphics Foundation 2.0 (WGF 2.0), the graphics API for Windows Longhorn operating system. It is unknown, whether the NV50 was targeted to support WGF 2.0 or not.

<%BANNER[vz_bottom]%>

Discussion

Comments currently: 6
Discussion started: 12/05/04 04:22:25 PM
Latest comment: 01/06/05 07:24:04 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-5]

1. 
[homer]Mmmmmmm... 24 pixel pipelines... mmmmmmmmm[/homer]
[Posted by: Jeff7181 | Date: 12/05/04 04:22:25 PM]

2. 
just a name change, lmfao
[Posted by: lmfao | Date: 12/05/04 08:53:03 PM]

3. 
This is exciting as sittiing on a toilet with a magazine.

Big whoop, they've canned two projects to make some big changes than was planned.

SO?
[Posted by: 65 | Date: 12/05/04 11:12:48 PM]

4. 
Well I'm wondering if they plan to use dual cores on the same pcb, and then drop the line size of the die down to .10 or maybe .09. That could use the same SLI technology they already have working and keep most of everything esle the same. Possibly with a small increase in clockspeed to boot.

But they will still need a core for Longhorn and that was supposed to be NV50..

Curious...
[Posted by: Anemone | Date: 12/06/04 03:37:51 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

5. 
dammit, i hate how nomatter when u buy something, e.g. my asus a8n sli deluxe, amd 64 3500+, nvidia 6800gt,

itll be outdated in a few months, BUT if u wait for the few months to pass, youll get screwed again.

i think nvidia, ati, intel and amd should all merge so we can have a completely kickass system, that ISNT like a mac
[Posted by: a pudding cup | Date: 01/06/05 07:24:04 AM]

[1-5]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Latest News

Monday, December 1, 2008

2:23 pm | Microsoft Readies Software Rasterizer for Windows 7. Microsoft Windows 7 to Get Software Emulator for DirectX 10, DirectX 10.1

8:45 am | Asustek Promises OLPC XO Competitor in Q1 2009. Asus Eee PC Version with $200 Price-Tag Scheduled for Q1

Sunday, November 30, 2008

11:14 pm | IN BRIEF: Intel Teams Up with Taiwanese Makers to Tap Digital Signage Market. Intel and Taiwanese Makers Form Digital Signage SIG Joint Venture

10:39 pm | Consumers Plan to Spend the Same or More This Holiday Season – Research Firm. Consumer Technology Spending Will Stay Flat or Will Grow, Claims ABI Research

10:21 pm | Intel Stresses Again: Netbook is Not a Notebook Replacement. Intel Admits Underestimation of Netbook Popularity on Developed Markets

1:55 pm | Dell Readies Notebooks with Two Central Processing Units. Dell Plans to Install Chips from ARM and Intel