It is not a secret that Nvidia Corp., currently the only supplier of DirectX 10-compliant visual processing units, is working on various versions of its GeForce 8-series graphics chips for various market segments. Which is rather a sensation is that Nvidia already ships beta drivers for Windows Vista that supports top-to-bottom GeForce 8 family, including a rather unexpected model GeForce 8800 Ultra.
Nvidia recently released new ForceWare version 100.41 drivers for Windows Vista operating system which, according to some findings, features support for several graphics products that have not been released so far, including GeForce 8800 Ultra, GeForce 8600 GTS, GeForce 8600 GT, GeForce 8500 GT, GeForce 8400 GS, GeForce 8300 GS.
The GeForce 8800 Ultra may become an overclocked version of the GeForce 8800 GTX, which has been shipping for several month, however, considering the exceptionally low availability of the GeForce 7800 GTX 512, which was released in late 2005 and which featured an overclocked by 120MHz GeForce 7800 GTX chip, the new Ultra may not feature extreme clock-speed, but have other improvements compared to the model 8800 GTX. It is also interesting to note that Nvidia has not used the “Ultra” moniker for its graphics processing units for several years already.
The GeForce 8600, 8500, 8400 and 8300 graphics products are likely to be aimed at performance-mainstream, mainstream and entry-level markets. Their specs currently remain unknown and are subject to change, as graphics chip designers usually tend to tweak their offerings till several weeks before the commercial launch.
The release of the new DirectX 10-supporting graphics cards from Nvidia is likely to increase pressure on ATI, graphics product group of Advanced Micro Devices, who has not yet unveiled any DirectX 10-compliant offerings.
Officials from Nvidia never comment on unreleased products.
Comments currently: 6
Discussion started: 03/05/07 11:18:53 AM
Latest comment: 03/18/07 03:24:45 PM
[1-6]
1.
I read a rumor on the Inquirer a few weeks ago that G80 has more to it than what we have seen so far.
If the 8800GTS has 32 shader units disabled from the GTX, who is to say that there weren't another 32 shaders tucked away for the Ultra? A 160 stream processor chip would be a sight to behold. Toss in higher clocks and maybe a 512-bit memory bus and you have me drooling.
Power consumption would suck, though.
[Posted by: Cheeseman | Date: 03/05/07 11:18:53 AM]
2.
It wil never have a 512 bus...they designed it all screwed up. It might come out with some 666 bus or some other craziness.
[Posted by: Po | Date: 03/05/07 11:27:20 AM]
3.
Since when was this unexpected (:
[Posted by: Silver | Date: 03/06/07 01:45:47 AM]
4.
the driver hacks are unreliable
Not too long ago a driver hack showed tons of 7xxx series cards.Almost all of the newly found ones never made it to the market.
U'll have to wait and see.
There may very well be a 8800 ultra
[Posted by: radicalx | Date: 03/06/07 06:51:08 AM]
5.
I never understood why the GTX 512 improvements weren't made standard across the board. I haven't looked into the 8800 series much, but I never understood why nVidia didn't release a massively available 7900GTX 512.
[Posted by: Psimitry | Date: 03/07/07 02:31:03 PM]
6.
I really hope this "8800 Ultra" would be a worthy
competitor to the X2900 XTX.But as always I'm an nVIDIA fanboy so in any case I will be getting the 8800 Ultrea.I hope it is released soon enough.
[Posted by: Erik Larsson | Date: 03/18/07 03:24:45 PM]
[1-6]