News

Technologies that can utilize the power of numerous graphics processing units (GPUs) for rendering have existed for years, but never were popular enough for the mass market. But ATI, graphics product group of Advanced Micro Devices, believes that the future of high-performance graphics sub-systems lies in the multi-GPU space. Though, the company does not explain what kind of multi-GPU is the future.

“AMD simply aren’t interested in building large monolithic GPUs any more, instead preferring to scale their offerings via multi-GPU,” Richard Huddy, developer relations chief at AMD’s graphics product group said at Develop conference, reports Beyond3D web-site.

The problem, according to Mr. Huddy, lies in the fact that graphics processors tend to be smaller and smaller, as manufacturing processes become thinner and going forward it would hardly be possible to equip high-performance, yet small, chips with wide memory busses, which means that their performance may be somewhat limited with the lack of enough memory bandwidth. As a result, ATI/AMD will focus on multi-GPU graphics sub-systems going forward, rather than on creating large monolithic graphics chips.

It is not completely clear whether AMD plans to cease developing graphics chips designed for graphics cards that cost $399 and more, but will just place a necessary number of mainstream GPUs onto a print-circuit board to get a high-performance graphics card.

Theoretically, multi-GPU solution may mean either several similar GPUs, like in the case of today’s ATI CrossFire or Nvidia SLI solutions, or several different GPUs, like in the case of Voodoo Graphics and Voodoo 2 solutions, where different chips performed different actions.

Nowadays graphics processors contain several key components, e.g., texture units, shader processors, render back ends, memory controller and so on. Theoretically, certain of such devices can function as standalone chips.

Discussion

Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 08/07/07 06:10:16 AM
Latest comment: 08/07/07 11:11:45 AM

[1-2]

1. 
I would advise them to concentrate on present, because if they continue like this they will not have future at all.
[Posted by: BorgDrone  | Date: 08/07/07 06:10:16 AM]

2. 
Well their current Multi-GPU solution sucks anyway. Lets see what they gonna do with "multi little cores working in tandem" can do. If its going to need game developer backing to use the technology you can declare its defeat already as ATi's dev relation is terrible, unless of course they change their ways dealing with devs.
[Posted by: Stubborn Hud  | Date: 08/07/07 11:11:45 AM]

[1-2]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS