<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[news_300]%>

News

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>
The GeForce FX graphic processor seems to be just around the corner, and this web-site unveiled some performance figures of the forthcoming solution. Needless to say that the new NVIDIA chip is a lot better compared to the RADEON 9700 PRO in a number of cases, as the product that comes in almost half a year after the rival should be better in some ways.

Unfortunately, the performance figures are relatively abstract, as there are no details about the test-setup, driver versions and so on. So, take them as they are and keep in mind that the drivers of the GeForce FX have not been released officially so far, just like the actual graphics cards.

  • Quake3 Demo001, 1600x1200 2xAA:
      NVIDIA GeForce FX: 209fps
      ATI RADEN 9700 PRO: 147 fps
  • Unreal Tournament 2003 Asbestos, 1600x1200 2xAA:
      NVIDIA GeForce FX: 140fps
      ATI RADEN 9700 PRO: 119fps
  • 3DMark Game4, 1600x1200 2xAA:
      NVIDIA GeForce FX: 41fps
      ATI RADEN 9700 PRO: 45fps

There are very few benchmark results and we cannot make any conclusions about the results as, firstly, the drivers of the GeForce FX are not ready to go at the moment, secondly, the actual configurations of the final graphics cards may be a bit different compared to the preliminary devices, thirdly, NVIDIA prohibited the reviewers to publish any results of the tests that stress memory bandwidth of the GeForce FX, finally, there are simply too few results to form positive or negative opinion at this point. What we see now is that the NVIDIA’s new graphics processor can beat the competing device from ATI in Quake3 when using FSAA at high resolutions by up to 40%. Basically, the game is presently too simple and the NV30’s higher fillrate and NVIDIA’s traditionally fast OpenGL drivers condition such results even despite of lower peak memory bandwidth. In the UT2003 game the GeForce FX does not have so high performance advantage over the competitor, just about 17%, furthermore, the newcomer is 9% behind ATI’s RADEON 9700 PRO in 3DMark Game4 that stresses the whole PC-system.

Expect the real review from a reliable web-site pretty soon.

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_2]%>
Comments currently: 0

You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Latest News

Thursday, August 21, 2008

1:54 pm | Intel Offers to Power Laptops Wirelessly. Intel Demos Wireless Resonant Energy Link

12:33 pm | Sony Announces New PlayStation 3 with Enlarged Hard Disk Drive. Sony to Release PlayStation 3 160GB for $499

11:30 am | Nvidia Plans to Add Another Graphics Card into GTX 200 Lineup. Nvidia Readies “Upgraded” GeForce GTX 260 – Rumours

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

7:58 pm | Intel Introduces First IA System on Chip for Consumer Electronics. Intel Architecture Everywhere

7:49 pm | Sony Announced PlayStation Portable (PSP) Update. New PSP Comes With Advanced LCD Screen and Built-In Microphone

7:40 pm | Hynix Demonstrates World's First 16 GB 2-Rank R-DIMM. Meta SDRAM Technology Doubles Memory Capacity of Server Systems

7:30 pm | Intel Expands Mobile CPU Family. Quad-Core Processors in Laptops – Now a Reality

11:04 am | Asustek Readies Mainboard with ATI’s and Nvidia’s Multi-GPU Technologies Support. Asustek Preps Motherboard with ATI CrossFire, Nvidia SLI Support