|
<%BANNER[left_130x130_1]%>
InformationX-bit Labs for mobile users! Do not forget that we are running a special version of X-bit Labs web-site for users of mobile and handheld devices: http://pda.xbitlabs.com. Check out our news and articles from smartphones and PDAs to be always updated on the latest computer and technology news. <%BANNER[left_130x130_2]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x300]%>
|
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
|
|
|
<%BANNER[banner_468x60]%>
News around the WebMonday, August 7, 2006Founders Seek Wikipedia Quality Improvements – Report. Improved Quality of Wikipedia Gets Official Support 11:37 pm | Yaroslav LyssenkoMaking an encyclopedia as complete as Encyclopedia Britannica is not an easy task. For years the famous edition has had no real rivals, but with the foundation of Wikipedia the things, it seemed, have changed. With more than 1.2 million articles in English alone, Wikipedia already has met its goal of becoming an encyclopedia that covers a huge amount of topics. However, being edited by freelancers, Wikipedia falls behind competitors in terms of rivals. Since its launch in 2001, Wikipedia has gained a gigantic presence on the Web and expanded into dozens of other languages. After succeeding in combining tons of knowledge, Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, addressed the community at the start of “Wikimania” event and emphasize the need to focus on quality instead of quantity, Associated Press reports. “Even while Wikipedia’s vast scope exceeds that of traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia would become even more valuable if entries were written less choppily, for example, or better identified their sources,” During the conference Wales also promised to introduce a few improvements coming to Wikipedia that will help improve its quality. “An editing tool called “Wikiwyg” – “wyg” stands for “what you get” — should make it easier to change articles. As of now, readers who click “edit this page” on a Wikipedia entry are confronted with a bit of programming code that can scare off less technologically savvy users, denying Wikipedia their expertise,” admitted Wales. Core 2 Duo vs. Core Duo – Investigation. Intel’s Merom Outperforms Yonah by 15% 11:36 pm | Yaroslav LyssenkoIt may be a new technology for desktop computers, but on mobile market Intel Core family microprocessors have been for some time now. In comparison to previous generation of mobile chips represented by code-named Yonah central processing units, mobile Core 2 Duo microprocessors, boast a number of improvements, but do those enhancements bring a really tangible performance benefit? Compared to Intel Core Duo (Yonah), Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) has larger L2 cache, slightly deeper pipeline and added decode and execution units. In addition, Merom features more aggressive pre-fetch mechanisms than Yonah, as well as Intel’s Memory Disambiguation technology that allows for out-of-order loads. In other words, not only is Merom able to process more data at once, at a faster speed, but it can also get access to that data quicker. In order to determine just how much Merom can be faster in real life applications, AnandTech has compared the newly released Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 to Intel Core Duo T2600 microprocessor. Both CPUs run at 2.33GHz frequency and are equipped with 4MB and 2MB of L2 cache, respectively. The investigation was carried out on Asus Z96Js notebook which is based on Intel’s 945PM chipset and is outfitted with a 15.4” widescreen display with a 1280x800 native resolution, supported by a 256MB ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 graphics chip and equipped with two 512MB PC2-5300 (667MHz) memory modules running at 5-5-5-15 memory timings. “Overall, Merom may not be as big of an upgrade to Yonah as All Latest News |
Hardware NewsMonday, December 1, 2008
Sunday, November 30, 2008
Friday, November 28, 2008
Thursday, November 27, 2008
<%BANNER[right_130x130_1]%>
<%BANNER[right_130x130_2]%>
|
|

