|
<%BANNER[left_130x130_1]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x300]%>
InformationX-bit Labs for mobile users! Do not forget that we are running a special version of X-bit Labs web-site for users of mobile and handheld devices: http://pda.xbitlabs.com. Check out our news and articles from smartphones and PDAs to be always updated on the latest computer and technology news. <%BANNER[left_130x130_2]%>
|
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
|
|
|
<%BANNER[banner_468x60]%>
News around the WebDDR and DDR2 Fight for NotebooksTwo Generations of DDR for Laptops Compared[ 06/30/2005 | 11:08 AM ] DDR2 memory was introduced over a year ago, but because of its high price and questionable performance benefit it is still not as widespread as DDR SDRAM. Apart from higher bandwidth, the new standard of memory provides another interesting feature, such as lower power consumption compared to the DDR, which is crucial for mobile computers. Legit Reviews has posted an article containing a comparison between DDR and DDR2 memory installed in notebook PCs. <%BANNER[article_nw]%>“Previous generation DDR1 notebook memory modules ran at PC-2700 (333MHz) at 2.5V or 2.6V depending on what IC’s are used on the modules. Most TSOP based DDR1 modules were set to run at 2.6V while micro-BGA ran at 2.5V due to lower power consumption. Desktop Computers with DDR1 PC-3200 (400MHz) modules had a suggested voltage of 2.7 Volts, so notebook memory was power hungry to say the least. DDR2 notebook SODIMMS are rated at 1.8 Volts, which is nearly a full Volt (0.8V) lower than DDR1 SODIMMs and feature IC’s based on the FBGA process. Our “It turns out that DDR2 memory looks pretty impressive when paired with a 533MHz Front Side Bus (FSB) Intel Dothan based processor. A significant performance increase was noted over our previous generation notebook, which is always a good thing. More processing power means better productivity and hopefully less time in front of the computer, which is a good thing,” concludes Legit Reviews. Discussion |
<%BANNER[right_130x130_1]%>
News Around the WebFriday, October 10, 2008
<%BANNER[right_130x600]%>
|
|

<%BANNER[foot_728x90]%>




