Web-Site Reviews AMD Opteron 165, 180 Processors

Performance of Affordable Opteron Chips Examined

by Yaroslav Lyssenko

[ 03/22/2006 | 09:27 PM ]

Originally introduced as server processors, AMD Opteron 100-series chips now use desktop infrastructure in a quite a lot of cases, which attracts a lot of attention of computer enthusiasts, particularly, overclockers, who plan acquiring such products for their desktops.

<%BANNER[article_nw]%>

While AMD Opteron processor 100-series is targeted at 1P server applications, such as those used by Internet and application service providers, and intensive workstation applications such as engineering and digital content creation software, the processors are very interesting for desktop enthusiasts. The Tech Report has compared AMD’s Opteron 165 and 180 processors with desktop offerings from AMD and Intel, both in professional applications as well as in popular games and contemporary office tasks.

“Fortunately, characterizing the performance of these two CPUs is fairly easy, thanks to a startling amount of consistency in terms of relative performance across a range of benchmarks. The Opteron 180 performs exactly like an Athlon 64 X2 4800+, which is to say, exceptionally well. This thing outruns the Pentium D 950 - ostensibly its most direct competitor from Intel - virtually across the board. The Opteron 180 also outperforms the more expensive Pentium Extreme Edition 955 in the lion’s share of our benchmark suite. For high-end, single-socket workstations, the Opteron 180 is as good as it gets right now. Only the Athlon 64 FX-60 is faster, but that chip is targeted at gaming PCs rather than workstations,” concludes the author.

“The performance picture for the Opteron 165 is more complex. More often than not, the 165 scores higher in the benchmarks than its closest real competitor, the Pentium D 930, but the Opteron 165 doesn’t have nearly the dominance that the Opteron 180 does. Although AMD’s K8 architecture delivers quite a bit of performance per clock, the Opteron 165’s 1.8GHz clock speed is low enough to keep it from really exploiting that architectural advantage. The 165’s relatively low memory bandwidth and high memory access latencies in our synthetic memory tests compared to the other K8 chips we tested are testaments to that fact. I would recommend stepping up to a higher clock speed if possible. At 2GHz, the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ looks like a better option for those building their own systems, at least if we’re talking about running at stock speeds,” adds the author in regards to AMD Opteron 165 performance level.

• The Tech Report: AMD’s Opteron 165 and 180 Processors.